Re: Re: Kde Plasma Desktop VsI prefer XFCE4 to KDE or Gnome. I use
By: Dr. What to poindexter FORTRAN > Thu Feb 05 2026 06:55 am
There's a new term now: "Getti > DW> Gnomed".
It's when you install one
application but it "needs" near > DW> all the Gnome environment loade > DW> to run, whether you use Gnome o > DW> not.
Yeah, I've noticed some Linux distro > have packages for Gnome support libraries. There are also KDE suppor > libraries as well.
And for UI themes, I've noticed that > even if you aren't using Gnome, some > the installed applications might be
using GTK (the Gnome toolkit); there > are a lot of GTK UI themes that will > get applied to those GTK application > but naturally, applications not usin > GTK won't get that theme. So you'll > have apps with one UI theme and othe > apps with a different UI theme.
Years ago, I used to like Gnome 2, a > when running in Gnome, all applicati > would look consistent with the same
theme. But that doesn't seem to be > case anymore with other desktop environments.
One thing I've noticed is that KDE
Plasma uses Qt, which is a
cross-platform GUI framework that I' > heard is considered one of the best > most popular (and wxWidgets being
another one). Qt is available for
Windows too, so theoretically, a
program written using the Qt GUI
framework (probably especially with
C++) would probably be able to be bu > and run for both Linux and Windows w > few modifications. I've done some C > development using wxWidgets and that > was one of the advantages of wxWidge > as well.
Nightfox
I prefer XFCE4 to KDE or Gnome. I use
Slackware and Gnome seems to be a lot
slower.
Re: Re: Kde Plasma Desktop VsI keep mine at 2560x1080. It works
By: Lumni1968 to Nightfox on Sun M > 08 2026 04:29 pm
I prefer XFCE4 to KDE or Gnome. > Lu> use
Slackware and Gnome seems to be > Lu> lot
slower.
I like XFCE, though if you have a
high-resolution monitor (maybe 1440p > 4K), it seems XFCE's scaling isn't t > greatest. I don't think it offers
fractional scaling (you could do 2x
scaling with it, but then everything > could look too big). I gave XFCE a > on my main PC, but I found that
Cinnamon looked better, and I think > Plasma looks even better. Also, it seems KDE Plasma is able to scale so > applications that still looked small > hard to read in Cinnamon, such as Zo > (for online video meetings). At lea > it seems that way in my experience.
Nightfox
I prefer XFCE4 to KDE or Gnome. I use Slackware and Gnome seems to be a lot slower.
Re: Re: Kde Plasma Desktop VsI might have to check that out.
By: Lumni1968 to Nightfox on Sun M > 08 2026 04:29 pm
I prefer XFCE4 to KDE or Gnome. > > use Slackware and Gnome seems to > > a lot slower.
if you ever want super light, try
something like openbox.
Lumni1968 wrote to phigan <=-
I prefer XFCE4 to KDE or Gnome. > > use Slackware and Gnome seems to
if you ever want super light, try
something like openbox.
I might have to check that out.
| Sysop: | Trapper |
|---|---|
| Location: | South Hadley, Ma. |
| Users: | 6 |
| Nodes: | 15 (0 / 15) |
| Uptime: | 21:25:58 |
| Calls: | 14 |
| Files: | 24 |
| Messages: | 1,509 |